Archive for April, 2006

Daily Edublogging Update — April 11, 2006

Here’s a summary of ideas and conversations from the edublogging community that have captured our attention in the past 48 hours.

David Warlick has posted the New Story Wiki and is inviting everyone to “Hack the story!” The site invites stories that “address three basic needs. They must connect with the market
place, resonate with deeply held values, and they must be something that we can
point to.” I really like George Siemens thoughts with regard to this ongoing meme. “While the picture of needed change is becoming more clear, our understanding of
“how to get there” is not. Some would have our river of change meander through classrooms, others suggest it flows through completely new models. Some suggest an evolution, others suggest a transformation.” It might also be interesting for folks thinking about the New Story to look at Kathy Sierra’s recent post on Steve’s stories. This is about Steve Jobs and how he uses stories successfully to sell his ideas. Good synergy here.

Chalksite is a new online service that provides free gradebook, messaging, and assignment capabilities to teachers and students. For a subscription fee, additional, premium services are available. Speaking of products for teachers and students, Stephen Powell has a good review of the LAMS platform. He says they have done a lot of things right in terms of user interface and overall usability, but that the product’s weakness is in its prescriptive pedagogy.

Also, don’t miss David Warlick’s post on flat classrooms. ” I hope to spend the next couple of weeks talking through some ideas concerning a
flat classroom learning engine, most of which I am still forming. But I would like to begin with a list of characteristics for students in a flat classroom learning engine.

  • Curious
  • Self Directed Learners
  • Intrinsic need to communicate
  • Intrinsic need to influence
  • Future Oriented
  • Heritage Grounded

I look forward to reading David’s ideas as they develop.

Finally, D’Arcy Norman resurrects the Universty 2.0 meme and sets forth a nice outline of what might be possible in the future as both technology and our views of learning continue to evolve.

Tech Trends — April 11, 2006

Here’s our take on news that matters for Tuesday, April 11. Today’s theme is me too, and here are a some links to headlines about technology that is changing the way we live and learn.

Lone Star Learning — Seeing Things Differently

We’ve all had those experiences where we were seeing a map of something familiar, but it was being shown in a way that made it unfamiliar. I remember seeing my first aerial map of some acreage my father owned and struggling to make sense of it. All of a sudden, my visual understanding of creeks, hills, and canyons was challenged by a different way of seeing those things.

Most of us have had similar experiences with topographical maps, X-rays, CAT Scans, and information bar charts. We carry around a notion of how something really is in our heads and then have that notion challenged when it’s shown to us from a different perspective.

It’s all about how we see things. Graham Wegner picked up on this in his recent post on visualizing learning networks. Actually “seeing” the information network and paths of knowledge that make up our learning can radically change the way we go about doing our work.

I was thinking about this when I saw a post on BoingBoing about a site called Cab Spotting. As the site says, “Cabspotting traces San Francisco’s taxi cabs as they travel throughout the Bay Area. The patterns traced by each cab create a living and always-changing map of city life. This map hints at economic, social, and cultural trends that are otherwise invisible.”

I think that’s when the significance of perspective– seeing things differently — really hit me. It was with the line “It hints at trends that are otherwise invisible.” Before I saw the Cab Spotting map I might have assumed that I was seeing things pretty clearly. But then I was shown a new perspective on the same information and I did start to see invisible patterns. I started to see things differently.

This, of course is the nature of and reason for creating new maps or views of our worlds. These new views confirm or dismiss our previous assumptions about things, and they stimulate us to conjure up new hypotheses about the reality we are living.

In the physical sciences this happened dramatically with the development of the telescope and microscope. The same has happened over the last 150 years with other discoveries in biology, physics, medicine, anthropology, psychology, literature, and, yes, education. From the lecture halls of humanities to space-age laboratories and super computers, our current era of rapid-fire information and discovery has given us new maps and new perspectives.

Lately, in the edublogging sphere, we’ve seen and heard a growing discussion about “Telling a New Story.” The idea is that we need to move towards a different understanding of learning and a different form of instruction. In other words, we need a new map for education. I happen to embrace this call for change, but I’m also aware that I have a personal stake in the outcome of the argument. My writing, my business, and my teaching are all affected positively by the New Story and adversely by the Old Story. Unfortunately, that tends to make me less interested in seeing things from too many different perspectives.

But knowing that the real secret to understanding is gaining new perspective — is seeing things differently — I start wondering about what else I should be mapping. I look at Cab Spotting and visualized learning networks and I ask myself what other invisible things am I missing?

Perhaps, instead of spending so much time on the obvious, I should be spending more on what I am not seeing, what I cannot see, and what I have trouble imagining. I’m not sure exactly what that means in terms of education, but I do know that I plan to spend more time looking for new maps in the future, and opening my thinking to whatever new information those maps can reveal.

I think I’ll call it my personal treasure hunt.

Broadcast Information

podcast feed
i-podder

Daily Edublogging Update — April 10, 2006

Here’s a summary of ideas and conversations from the edublogging community that have captured our attention in the past 48 hours.

Vicki Davis has a good follow-up to the Higher Ed BloggerCon session on blogging/wiki research. She gives a good overview of the session and reminds us that “Research is important and vital. It must be
href=”http://coolcatteacher.blogspot.com/2006/04/research-integrity-new-study-linking.html” target=”_blank”>unbiased and thorough. We must know why we do what we do and be willing to self-implement sometimes painful paradigm shifts. We must never be closed minded and learn to disagree as professionals.” Amen.

Dave Cormier talks about expertise, what it means to be one, and what it takes to remain one. Specifically, he discusses authority by accomplishment and authority by community, and questions the validity and processes by which such conference occurs.

Another theme going around is that of education as experiment. Wesley Fryer has this post responding to an earlier article by Doug Johnson. Wesley argues:

“In the educational, classroom environment, authentic education is always experimental. This is because
href=”http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=discoveringharry%26link_code=xm2%26camp=2025%26creative=165953%26path=http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html%253fASIN=1412909023%2526tag=discoveringharry%2526lcode=xm2%2526cID=2025%2526ccmID=165953%2526location=/o/ASIN/1412909023%25253FSubscriptionId=02ZH6J1W0649DTNS6002″>teaching is an art, not a science. Many, many people sadly mistake the purpose of the educational enterprise as mere content transmission.”

I agree with the part about content transmission, but I’m not sure that necessarily makes all authentic education experimental. Now, if he had said experiential. Brian Crosby has also chimed in on the subject and Doug Johnson has followed up his first post with further conversation on the topic.

Finally, Gardner Campbell posts an audio file of a student panel discussing “life online.” This is a great insight into the lives of students.

In the general stuff category:

Tech Trends — April 10, 2006

Here’s our take on news that matters for Monday, April 10. Today’s theme is virtual is good, and here are a some links to headlines about technology that is changing the way we live and learn.

What’s Up and What Matters — April 9, 2006

This is Rob Reynolds’ weekly assessment of events related to technology, education, and culture. This week’s recap hits on the new Boot Camp download from Apple as well as recent surveys on podcasting (by Forrester) and on mobile phone usage (AP/AOL/Pew ). This presentation also provides updates regarding the CTIA Wireless Conference and new movie downloading services. From the education world, Rob treats news related to the One Laptop per Child initiative as well as e-books. Finally, the past week’s hot memes in the edublogging space included the “New Story,” gaming, and the concept of an electronic press of academia.

Click here to launch the multimedia presentation

Click here to download the transcript

View article links for this podcast on del.icio.us

Click here to download MP3 file

Daily Edublogging Update — April 7, 2006

Here’s a summary of ideas and conversations from the edublogging community that have captured our attention in the past 48 hours.

I’m really liking what Christopher Sessums has written about blogging as an expression of self. He provides a nice framework for his comments and points to what other active edubloggers have written on the subject.

Alana Levine has always been good at featuring outstanding faculty who have a real vision for technology in education (we’ll miss this piece of you in your new job, Alan), In this post, he interviews Karen Schwalm, who has done some interesting things with podcasting and providing motivational essays for her students. Karen uses Odeo for her work and, for an idea of what she’s doing, check out this example.

Also, I love this quote from George Siemens from his post on Reinvention.”

“…society is changing, but education doesn’t understand the nature (and depth) of that change). We still think we are dealing with an entity that we can control, box, etc. Education has long been a driver of change in society, but the current lethargy in adjusting to new social and technological environments is disconcerting.”

Finally, Clarence Fisher has a thoughtful post on gaming and how its framework can apply to education. Miguel Guhlin adds his reflection to this post here.

Tech Trends — April 7, 2006

Here’s our take on news that matters for Friday, April 7. Today’s theme is it’s better than you think, and here are a some links to headlines about technology that is changing the way we live and learn.

Students on Student Technology — Why We Like Xanga (Part 1)

Human contact. Something every human yearns for — especially teenagers. Every free scrap of time morphs into time to jump in the car and drive to a friend’s house or a hang–out spot like a snow cone stand (my friends knew the exact day and time the local snow cone stands opened this spring). But, sometimes teenagers just can’t get out. Parents generally put time limits on our outings and there are plenty of times when you only have when you only have twenty minutes between events in your day, which leaves no time to hang out. Even worse, if you’re like me you could actually get grounded for a whole weekend. Thankfully, with Xanga, when you can’t be with your friends physically, you can at least browse their thoughts online as well share your own ideas.

Xanga is an online blogging site that now also allows you to accumulate a social network. With it, you can keep track of your friends’ lives by reading their latest posts, and get connected to people you haven’t spoken to in years (as long as they have a Xanga too). It’s a great way to keep updated on people’s lives and to share your own ordeals when you’re stuck at home with nothing to do. I first created a Xanga as an underclassman. I had no car and no cell phone so I resorted to the Internet as a way to stay connected with my friends.

I prefer Xanga to Myspace because it’s more personal. If people don’t know you, or don’t know someone else who knows you, then its really hard for someone to randomly happen across your site. Xanga mainly serves to connect you with an already established base of friends. Sure the friend base can be expanded as you get to know more individuals, but it’s nice to be semi–anonymous to the rest of the Xanga community.

The main attraction of Xanga for me and my friends is the ability to write and post your own thoughts and ideas, quotes and passages from books, or even pictures. You also get to read your friends’ posts, and comment on them. Xanga certainly helps us understand each other better — you learn to see people differently when you really understand where they are coming from and how they think.

Xanga is also an amazing resource for keeping in touch with friends. My friend Marisa and I stayed in contact through Xanga while she went to study in Hungary for several months. I also use it to keep track of all my former high school friends who are now in college. Between their tests and homework it’s nearly impossible to schedule a few hours of time with them, let alone spend hours on the phone sharing the infinite details of their lives.

Interaction with friends is necessary for friendships to continue, and Xanga is a great way to make that interaction happen. It works if you’re separated by continents, or simply stuck inside because of weather or punishment. I think it probably seems like time wasted to parents, but a good deal of the time teenagers spend on Xanga should be considered social interaction. While that may not seem like a huge thing to some parents, but believe me, it is.

Daily Edublogging Update — April 6, 2006

Many people are blogging about Higher Ed BloggerCon. Will Richardson has a nice overview of posts from the first several days that can get you started if you haven’t been keeping up.

Christian Long has a good post on contextual advertising. As an alternative to what has been done, he mentions The Deck, a great concept that puts together a tightly-grouped set of content providers that can guarantee a concentrated audience for products.

Clarence Fisher provides this update about the podcasts and vlogs his students have been creating in his classes. He held conferences with them recently and shares some of their thinking as new authors. The results are telling.

We’ve been posting regularly about the releases over at ajaxLaunch, and this week Michael Robertson turns us on to the first public release of eyespot.com, a site for posting and sharing video. Albert Ip has a nice review of the product (as well as the other ajaxLaunch initiatives).

The “New Story” meme is still going strong. This week, Dean Shareski and David Warlick have solid posts on the topic. Also, Gardner Campbell writes this terrific article in which he shares some remarkable things happening with students and learning (a glimpse at the hope offered by the “New Story”).

Finally, Christopher Sessums posts his thoughts about collegiality and collaboration in teacher professional development.

“Collaboration and collegiality take teacher development beyond individual reflection, or reliance on external experts, to a point where educators can learn from one another, sharing and building expertise together.”

This article is full of Sessum’s usual thoughtfulness and documentation.