The sergeant major
is sitting in a “hardened” tent somewhere in or near harm’s way. The
online element of the course is accessed via satellite connection. In about
2 months, the student will go to a one-week course held on base in Europe for
a face-to-face component. Meanwhile, a newly commissioned officer in the Coast
Guard is lying on his bunk (rack), his Dell Axim in hand, browsing through the
leadership course he is taking. He reads the course objectives, listens to lectures,
watches a slide show and brief movies - all on his handheld computer the size
of a Palm Pilot.
The delivery methods
range from interactive, web-based formats, to content delivered via a chip inserted
into a handheld, in a way that reminds one of a game. However, what remains
constant is the fact that the courses are administered at a distance, often
under very awkward, harsh, or disruptive conditions.
What are the key
secrets of success? Things are not always what they seem. Perhaps one thinks
it’s all about a high-tech presentation, and Hollywood-produced videos. Perhaps
one thinks it’s all about developing realistic, video-game-based simulations.
These are good
components, but what is most important is learner autonomy. The distance learner
- in a 100% distance course, or a hybrid - succeeds when he or she can exercise
autonomy.
What do we mean
by learner autonomy?
–Options for learner self-direction
–Learner activities can be done independently
–Learners have the opportunity to be self-starters
Certain conditions
must be satisfied in order for learner autonomy to be at all possible. What
are they?
–Learners must
be able to use the technology (the hardware as well as the software. This applies
now more than ever with handheld devices, portable data devices, etc.).
–The learning management system must be understandable, and there should be
help that is available on-demand.
–Instructions for administrative tasks should be easy to find and use (online
registration, online payment, etc.).
–The order of tasks, instructional activities, rubrics, etc. should be organized
in a way that is easy to find and follow.
–The course objectives should be flexible enough to allow the learner to adapt
them and make connections between one’s own goals and course content and objectives.
–The course should be designed in such a way that one can take course content,
organize it, and use it as a point of departure for generalizations and meta-cognitive
tasks.
–The course design should be developed in a way that when learners identify “holes in scaffolding,” they can go back and fill in the gaps.








0 Responses to “Military Success Hinges on Enhanced Learner Autonomy”